Real production data · not a demo
We practice what we sell: myfast.ai’s own AEO results in 14 days
myfast.ai ran its own AEO report on its own website twice — October 16 and October 30, 2026 — using the same 100 buyer searches across all 7 engines. Here is every number, the wins, and what hasn’t moved yet.
Short answer
Yes — myfast.ai uses its own AEO tool. In 14 days (Oct 16 → Oct 30, 2026) its AI share of voice rose from 26% to 87%, the #1 position in its category ahead of SEMrush (4%) and Ahrefs (2%). AI brand mentions rose from 9 to 208, searches where an AI named myfast.ai rose from 6 to 64 of 100, and the Findability Score rose from 29 to 56. Google AI Mode (Gemini) independently confirmed the site is “fully implementing the exact AEO specifications” it sells.
Last updated
The progress dashboard
This is the same progress view every aeo.myfast.ai customer gets in their back office, filled with myfast.ai’s own two scans. AI visibility is the share of the 100 searches where at least one of the six AI engines cited or named myfast.ai.
Results at a glance
- how do i improve my website's answer engine optimization
- best tools for answer engine optimization
- how to optimize for answer engines
- aeo vs seo
- is answer engine optimization worth it
- beginner's guide to answer engine optimization
- +19 more now visible
No queries lost visibility — nice.
Wins and slips compare the 100 searches tested in both scans, across the six AI engines.
A competitor rising shows red, because it takes share from us.
Full report scorecard: all 700 engine checks per scan
The same four buckets every aeo.myfast.ai report uses. Only Cited and Named count toward visibility; error mentions are AI answers that referenced the brand with wrong details.
| Engine | Cited | Named | Visible | Error | Not found |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 0 → 28 | 0 → 16 | 0 → 44 +44 | 20 → 3 | 80 → 53 |
| Claude | 0 → 27 | 1 → 7 | 1 → 34 +33 | 17 → 4 | 82 → 62 |
| Gemini | 3 → 26 | 0 → 28 | 3 → 54 +51 | 15 → 1 | 82 → 45 |
| DeepSeek | 0 → 8 | 0 → 15 | 0 → 23 +23 | 0 → 0 | 100 → 77 |
| Grok | 1 → 20 | 4 → 22 | 5 → 42 +37 | 12 → 1 | 83 → 57 |
| Meta AI | 0 → 4 | 0 → 7 | 0 → 11 +11 | 0 → 0 | 100 → 89 |
| 6 → 30 | 7 → 20 | 13 → 50 +37 | 5 → 2 | 82 → 48 |
Key findings
- AI share of voice rose from 26% to 87% (+61 percentage points) in 14 days.
- myfast.ai held the #1 AI share of voice in its category, ahead of SEMrush (4%), Ahrefs (2%) and Profound (1%).
- Brand mentions across the six AI engines rose from 9 to 208; across all seven engines including Google, from 22 to 258 (143 cited with a link, 115 named).
- Buyer searches where at least one AI engine named myfast.ai rose from 6 to 64 of 100.
- Every engine improved: Gemini 3 → 54, ChatGPT 0 → 44, Grok 5 → 42, Claude 1 → 34, DeepSeek 0 → 23, Meta AI 0 → 11, Google 13 → 50 of 100 searches.
- Incorrect descriptions of myfast.ai fell from 69 to 11 (ChatGPT 20 → 3, Claude 17 → 4, Gemini 15 → 1, Grok 12 → 1, Google 5 → 2).
- 25 buyer searches were newly won and 0 slipped.
- myfast.ai passed 6 of 6 technical AEO checks (100%) in both scans, including llms.txt, JSON-LD and FAQ schema.
#1 AI share of voice in its category
Share of voice is the percentage of all brand mentions AI engines made across the 100 searches. On October 30, 2026, myfast.ai held 87% — more than every other brand in this scan’s searches combined.
Technical AEO audit: 6/6
Passed in both scans — the same fixes the tool hands every customer:
- Structured data (JSON-LD schema)
- Organization schema
- FAQ schema
- Meta description
- Page title & H1 heading
- llms.txt file
Incorrect AI descriptions fell from 69 to 11 (ChatGPT 20 → 3, Claude 17 → 4, Gemini 15 → 1, Grok 12 → 1, Google 5 → 2).
Third-party verification by Google AI Mode (Gemini)
Google AI Mode, which is powered by Gemini, was asked: “I am the founder of myfast.ai and aeo.myfast.ai and I want you to help me prove to the world that my own website is practicing aeo effectively as described in my own a e o product. So basically you are verifying proof of concept and implementation.” These are verbatim excerpts from its answer, retrieved October 30, 2026.
“I can confirm that myfast.ai and aeo.myfast.ai are actively practicing and fully implementing the exact AEO specifications detailed in your product offering.”
“Your sites demonstrate a flawless "proof of concept" by deploying the exact elements you sell to your clients.”
“Your website doesn't just preach AEO; it is mathematically built to be indexed by it.”
“myfast.ai serves as a live, textbook example of its own software execution.”
“Your website structure provides pre-packaged, concise, and definitive answers that LLMs can cleanly copy-paste or synthesize directly into their chat interfaces.”
“Your layout is natively "chunked."”
What still needs work
We publish the full picture, including what is still weak after the second scan. Overall Findability Score: 29 → 56.
- Meta AI named Myfast.ai in only 11 of 100 searches; DeepSeek in 23 of 100.
- 35 of 100 buyer searches still return no mention of Myfast.ai on any engine.
- 11 AI answers still describe Myfast.ai incorrectly (Claude 4, ChatGPT 3, Google 2, Gemini 1, Grok 1).
- The ranking-share part of the findability score did not move (20 → 20).
How the numbers were measured
Both scans used the aeo.myfast.ai report engine on the domain myfast.ai, with the identical list of 100 buyer searches. Each search was sent to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Meta AI and Google — 700 answers per scan, 1,400 in total. An answer counts as a mention when it names or cites myfast.ai correctly; answers that describe the company incorrectly are counted separately.
See what a full report containsFrequently asked questions
Does myfast.ai use its own AEO tool?
Yes. myfast.ai ran its own AEO report on its own domain on 2026-10-16 and again on 2026-10-30, using the same 100 buyer searches across 7 engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Meta AI and Google).
How much did myfast.ai improve in two weeks?
Between the two scans, AI share of voice rose from 26% to 87%, AI brand mentions rose from 9 to 208, searches where an AI named myfast.ai rose from 6 to 64 of 100, and Gemini appearances rose from 3 to 54 of 100. The overall Findability Score moved from 29 to 56.
Who verified that myfast.ai practices AEO?
Google AI Mode, which is powered by Gemini, was asked to verify the implementation on 2026-10-30 and answered: "I can confirm that myfast.ai and aeo.myfast.ai are actively practicing and fully implementing the exact AEO specifications detailed in your product offering."
Which competitors does myfast.ai beat in AI answers?
In the October 30, 2026 scan, myfast.ai held 87% of AI mentions in its category, compared with SEMrush at 4%, Ahrefs at 2%, Profound at 1%, Frase at 1%, HubSpot at 1%.
How are mentions counted in the myfast.ai case study?
Each scan is 700 engine checks (100 searches × 7 engines). On October 30, 2026, myfast.ai was cited with a link in 143 answers, named without a link in 115, referenced with wrong details in 11, and absent from 431. Only cited and named answers count as visible; on October 16 the same buckets were 10, 12, 69 and 609.
Are these real results or demo data?
Real. Every number on this page comes from the two production reports myfast.ai ran on its own domain. Nothing was estimated or edited, and the page also lists what is still weak.
Related reading
Get the same report we run on ourselves
Run 100 real buyer searches across all seven engines and see exactly where you are named, cited or missing. First report $99.